https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51959 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld penalties imposed under Rule 173Q on Riddhi Siddhi Processors and under Rule 209A on Jag Prakash Synthetics. Penalty on Atul G. Gandhi was set aside due to being a partner in Riddhi Siddhi Processors. Penalties on the other two appellants were upheld as the amount evaded was significant. Appeal E/1113 allowed, while appeals E/1112 and E/1114 dismissed. en-us Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:11:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51959 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld penalties imposed under Rule 173Q on Riddhi Siddhi Processors and under Rule 209A on Jag Prakash Synthetics. Penalty on Atul G. Gandhi was set aside due to being a partner in Riddhi Siddhi Processors. Penalties on the other two appellants were upheld as the amount evaded was significant. Appeal E/1113 allowed, while appeals E/1112 and E/1114 dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 21 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51959