<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1721 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792518</link>
    <description>A composite show-cause notice covering multiple tax periods under the CGST Act was held impermissible, as clubbing, consolidation or bunching distinct financial years into one notice was treated as defective and without jurisdiction. Because the foundation notice was invalid, the order-in-original and all consequential demand proceedings could not survive and were quashed. Liberty was reserved to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 08:59:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1721 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792518</link>
      <description>A composite show-cause notice covering multiple tax periods under the CGST Act was held impermissible, as clubbing, consolidation or bunching distinct financial years into one notice was treated as defective and without jurisdiction. Because the foundation notice was invalid, the order-in-original and all consequential demand proceedings could not survive and were quashed. Liberty was reserved to proceed afresh in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>