<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 191 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51955</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving excisable goods clearance for export without proof of export. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was dismissed as the Tribunal found sufficient proof of export through other documents, despite the lack of cross-references in the AR-4As and shipping bills. The appeal was rejected as the genuineness of other export documents was not disputed by the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:59:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 191 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51955</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision in a case involving excisable goods clearance for export without proof of export. The Revenue&#039;s challenge was dismissed as the Tribunal found sufficient proof of export through other documents, despite the lack of cross-references in the AR-4As and shipping bills. The appeal was rejected as the genuineness of other export documents was not disputed by the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>