<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 81 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51950</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, granting the appellants interest on the delayed refund of pre-deposit amounts under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. It held that the appellants are entitled to interest from the expiry of three months after the Tribunal&#039;s Final Order until the refund date. The Tribunal rejected the respondent&#039;s argument that interest is payable only from the date of the Final Order, affirming that even remand orders necessitate a refund with interest. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligns with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent in Kuil Fireworks Industries, supporting the appellants&#039; entitlement to interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 13:02:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90428" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 81 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51950</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, granting the appellants interest on the delayed refund of pre-deposit amounts under Section 35F of the Central Excise Act. It held that the appellants are entitled to interest from the expiry of three months after the Tribunal&#039;s Final Order until the refund date. The Tribunal rejected the respondent&#039;s argument that interest is payable only from the date of the Final Order, affirming that even remand orders necessitate a refund with interest. The Tribunal&#039;s decision aligns with the Supreme Court&#039;s precedent in Kuil Fireworks Industries, supporting the appellants&#039; entitlement to interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51950</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>