<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 80 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51949</link>
    <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the confirmation of duty demand and imposition of penalty. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to legal requirements for invoking extended limitation periods and recognizing inherent manufacturing losses as per the prescribed wastage norms.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:32:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90427" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 80 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51949</link>
      <description>The tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the confirmation of duty demand and imposition of penalty. The decision emphasized the importance of adhering to legal requirements for invoking extended limitation periods and recognizing inherent manufacturing losses as per the prescribed wastage norms.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51949</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>