<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 79 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51948</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the printer is classifiable under sub-heading 8471.60 and the driver software on CD under sub-heading 8524.39. Both are to be assessed together under sub-heading 8471.60 on a combined value of US $150.27 per piece. The Tribunal found that the driver software should be classified separately as it was not embedded or integrated with the printer but imported along with it. The provisions of Section 19 of the Customs Act, 1962, and Accessories (Conditions) Rules, 1963, were correctly applied in determining the assessment. The impugned order-in-appeal was set aside, and the department&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:29:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 79 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51948</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the printer is classifiable under sub-heading 8471.60 and the driver software on CD under sub-heading 8524.39. Both are to be assessed together under sub-heading 8471.60 on a combined value of US $150.27 per piece. The Tribunal found that the driver software should be classified separately as it was not embedded or integrated with the printer but imported along with it. The provisions of Section 19 of the Customs Act, 1962, and Accessories (Conditions) Rules, 1963, were correctly applied in determining the assessment. The impugned order-in-appeal was set aside, and the department&#039;s appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51948</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>