<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (12) TMI 1081 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468995</link>
    <description>The civil appeal was dismissed because the Tribunal found, as a matter of fact, that the show cause notice was time-barred. That limitation finding was the sole basis for dismissal, and the Court expressly kept the classification issue open without deciding it. The operative effect was that the dispute ended on limitation alone, while the substantive classification question remained undecided and available for consideration in an appropriate case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 14:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (12) TMI 1081 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468995</link>
      <description>The civil appeal was dismissed because the Tribunal found, as a matter of fact, that the show cause notice was time-barred. That limitation finding was the sole basis for dismissal, and the Court expressly kept the classification issue open without deciding it. The operative effect was that the dispute ended on limitation alone, while the substantive classification question remained undecided and available for consideration in an appropriate case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>