<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 78 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51946</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the transaction value of the oil rig at $17 million should be accepted, rejecting the Commissioner&#039;s valuation of Rs. 1451,893,375 ($32.78 million). It ruled that the relationship between the buyer and seller did not influence the price and acknowledged market fluctuations. The penalties imposed on the importer and Bureau Veritas were deemed unjustified and were set aside. The Tribunal also found no grounds for applying the extended period of limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act. The decision was based on market conditions, industry practices, and the specific sale circumstances, ensuring compliance with Customs Valuation Rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 14:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90424" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 78 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51946</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the transaction value of the oil rig at $17 million should be accepted, rejecting the Commissioner&#039;s valuation of Rs. 1451,893,375 ($32.78 million). It ruled that the relationship between the buyer and seller did not influence the price and acknowledged market fluctuations. The penalties imposed on the importer and Bureau Veritas were deemed unjustified and were set aside. The Tribunal also found no grounds for applying the extended period of limitation under Section 28 of the Customs Act. The decision was based on market conditions, industry practices, and the specific sale circumstances, ensuring compliance with Customs Valuation Rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>