<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 188 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51945</link>
    <description>Site-fabricated ladders and staircases were held to have been manufactured by independent contractors acting on a principal-to-principal basis, because the contracts fixed specifications, quantities and rates, and the contractors used their own tools and bore their own liabilities. The items themselves were treated as immovable property, as they were tailor-made, permanently grouted and fastened, and formed integral parts of the mill structures. Since such embedded structures lacked the character of marketable movable goods, they were not excisable goods. On that basis, the duty demand, penalty and confiscation could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:17:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 188 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51945</link>
      <description>Site-fabricated ladders and staircases were held to have been manufactured by independent contractors acting on a principal-to-principal basis, because the contracts fixed specifications, quantities and rates, and the contractors used their own tools and bore their own liabilities. The items themselves were treated as immovable property, as they were tailor-made, permanently grouted and fastened, and formed integral parts of the mill structures. Since such embedded structures lacked the character of marketable movable goods, they were not excisable goods. On that basis, the duty demand, penalty and confiscation could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>