<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1593 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792391</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit on services such as software, servicing, interior and civil works, professional services, catering, insurance, security, housekeeping, club membership and rent-a-cab was examined under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The governing test was whether the services had a real and sufficient nexus with the business or output service, and after 01.04.2011 whether they fell within the amended exclusions, including services used primarily for employees&#039; personal use or consumption. The appellant showed business linkage and reversed inadmissible credits where identified, while the Department failed to prove lack of nexus or applicability of the exclusions. The disallowance was therefore held unsustainable and credit was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 08:21:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1593 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792391</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit on services such as software, servicing, interior and civil works, professional services, catering, insurance, security, housekeeping, club membership and rent-a-cab was examined under Rule 2(l) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004. The governing test was whether the services had a real and sufficient nexus with the business or output service, and after 01.04.2011 whether they fell within the amended exclusions, including services used primarily for employees&#039; personal use or consumption. The appellant showed business linkage and reversed inadmissible credits where identified, while the Department failed to prove lack of nexus or applicability of the exclusions. The disallowance was therefore held unsustainable and credit was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>