https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792399 Under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, limitation for an appeal runs from the date of pronouncement of the impugned order, not from later upload or the date of knowledge. The Tribunal applied binding precedent to treat the filing period as fixed by the statutory scheme, with only a further 15-day condonable window on sufficient cause. It also held that alleged OTP failures or e-filing portal glitches cannot extend jurisdiction beyond the express outer limit. The appeal, filed beyond the maximum permissible period, was therefore time-barred and the delay could not be condoned. en-us Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 28 May 2026 08:21:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792399 Under Section 61(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, limitation for an appeal runs from the date of pronouncement of the impugned order, not from later upload or the date of knowledge. The Tribunal applied binding precedent to treat the filing period as fixed by the statutory scheme, with only a further 15-day condonable window on sufficient cause. It also held that alleged OTP failures or e-filing portal glitches cannot extend jurisdiction beyond the express outer limit. The appeal, filed beyond the maximum permissible period, was therefore time-barred and the delay could not be condoned. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792399