<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1616 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792414</link>
    <description>A civil appeal challenging a Tribunal order failed because the appellant did not show sufficient cause for condonation of a 187-day delay. The SC also found, independently on the facts and circumstances, that the Tribunal&#039;s order disclosed no error of law or fact warranting interference. The delay was therefore not condoned and the appeal was dismissed on merits, leaving the Tribunal&#039;s decision undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 08:21:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904192" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1616 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792414</link>
      <description>A civil appeal challenging a Tribunal order failed because the appellant did not show sufficient cause for condonation of a 187-day delay. The SC also found, independently on the facts and circumstances, that the Tribunal&#039;s order disclosed no error of law or fact warranting interference. The delay was therefore not condoned and the appeal was dismissed on merits, leaving the Tribunal&#039;s decision undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792414</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>