https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51941 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, ruled in favor of the appellant, engaged in job work manufacturing of motor vehicle parts, in a case involving the determination of the value of goods for assessment under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The Tribunal held that Rule 8 does not apply when goods are manufactured by a job worker for another party. As the goods used in production were supplied by another party and not manufactured by the appellant, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders demanding duty and penalty based on Rule 8. en-us Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:01:14 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51941 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, ruled in favor of the appellant, engaged in job work manufacturing of motor vehicle parts, in a case involving the determination of the value of goods for assessment under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The Tribunal held that Rule 8 does not apply when goods are manufactured by a job worker for another party. As the goods used in production were supplied by another party and not manufactured by the appellant, the Tribunal allowed the appeals, setting aside the impugned orders demanding duty and penalty based on Rule 8. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51941