<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1623 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792421</link>
    <description>Reassessment reopening is invalid where the recorded reasons do not allege that the assessee failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. The ITAT Delhi found that the reopening reasons contained no such allegation and therefore lacked the jurisdictional foundation required to invoke reassessment. Once that defect was established, the merits of the addition became academic. The reopening was quashed and the reassessment challenge succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 08:21:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904185" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1623 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792421</link>
      <description>Reassessment reopening is invalid where the recorded reasons do not allege that the assessee failed to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. The ITAT Delhi found that the reopening reasons contained no such allegation and therefore lacked the jurisdictional foundation required to invoke reassessment. Once that defect was established, the merits of the addition became academic. The reopening was quashed and the reassessment challenge succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>