<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 117 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51938</link>
    <description>Where the assessee took Cenvat credit on coating materials used for coating steel pipes but discharged excise duty on the final product on the full value of coated pipes, the Tribunal held that the credit stood effectively reversed because it was utilised to pay duty that was not otherwise payable. Since the credit had already been neutralised through such utilisation, a further demand for reversal would amount to double reversal and was unsustainable. The impugned order confirming demand was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90416" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 117 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51938</link>
      <description>Where the assessee took Cenvat credit on coating materials used for coating steel pipes but discharged excise duty on the final product on the full value of coated pipes, the Tribunal held that the credit stood effectively reversed because it was utilised to pay duty that was not otherwise payable. Since the credit had already been neutralised through such utilisation, a further demand for reversal would amount to double reversal and was unsustainable. The impugned order confirming demand was set aside and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51938</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>