<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 70 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51935</link>
    <description>Clearances from the same factory are counted in the aggregate value for small-scale exemption under Notification No. 8/98-C.E. unless the notification expressly excludes duty-paid clearances of another manufacturer from the same premises, so the earlier manufacturer&#039;s clearances were includible. Where duty is embedded in the sale price, the assessable value must be recomputed on a cum-duty basis, and Modvat credit on inputs is allowable subject to verification of duty-paying documents. The exemption issue was resolved against the assessee, while the valuation and credit issues were resolved in its favour, leading to fresh computation and consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:49:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90413" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 70 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51935</link>
      <description>Clearances from the same factory are counted in the aggregate value for small-scale exemption under Notification No. 8/98-C.E. unless the notification expressly excludes duty-paid clearances of another manufacturer from the same premises, so the earlier manufacturer&#039;s clearances were includible. Where duty is embedded in the sale price, the assessable value must be recomputed on a cum-duty basis, and Modvat credit on inputs is allowable subject to verification of duty-paying documents. The exemption issue was resolved against the assessee, while the valuation and credit issues were resolved in its favour, leading to fresh computation and consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51935</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>