<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1959 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468983</link>
    <description>A bona fide typographical error in selecting the wrong clause in a registration application under section 12A(1)(ac) was treated as a curable defect, so the rejection was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration under the correct clause after giving the assessee an opportunity to place relevant material. Because approval under section 80G(5) was consequential to the registration issue, that refusal was also set aside and remanded for reconsideration on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 20:06:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904111" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1959 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468983</link>
      <description>A bona fide typographical error in selecting the wrong clause in a registration application under section 12A(1)(ac) was treated as a curable defect, so the rejection was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh consideration under the correct clause after giving the assessee an opportunity to place relevant material. Because approval under section 80G(5) was consequential to the registration issue, that refusal was also set aside and remanded for reconsideration on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468983</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>