<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 66 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51928</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, stating that Central Excise duty is not chargeable on tyres destroyed during testing by a company. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of testing for making goods marketable and referenced previous decisions, including a Supreme Court ruling, to support their decision. They rejected the Department&#039;s argument that duty is payable as soon as goods are manufactured, highlighting the necessity of testing for ensuring product quality. As a result, the Tribunal allowed both appeals in favor of the Appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:26:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90406" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 66 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51928</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellants, stating that Central Excise duty is not chargeable on tyres destroyed during testing by a company. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of testing for making goods marketable and referenced previous decisions, including a Supreme Court ruling, to support their decision. They rejected the Department&#039;s argument that duty is payable as soon as goods are manufactured, highlighting the necessity of testing for ensuring product quality. As a result, the Tribunal allowed both appeals in favor of the Appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51928</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>