https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16508 Rectification was sought to correct an inadvertent typing error in a High Court judgment in the Maruti Udyog matter, where the answer to a substantial question of law had been recorded in a manner that produced the opposite legal effect. The rectification substituted the words stating the issue was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue and against the Assessee, with words stating it was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the rectification order and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. en-us Wed, 27 May 2026 07:29:59 +0530 Wed, 27 May 2026 07:29:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16508 Rectification was sought to correct an inadvertent typing error in a High Court judgment in the Maruti Udyog matter, where the answer to a substantial question of law had been recorded in a manner that produced the opposite legal effect. The rectification substituted the words stating the issue was answered in the negative, in favour of the Revenue and against the Assessee, with words stating it was answered in the affirmative, in favour of the Assessee and against the Revenue. The Supreme Court found no reason to interfere with the rectification order and dismissed the Special Leave Petition. Articles Income Tax Wed, 27 May 2026 07:29:59 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=16508