<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 164 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51926</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal that rejected the refund claim. It was held that filing a refund claim challenges the assessment order and is maintainable even without directly challenging the assessment through an appeal. The matter was remanded for further consideration, emphasizing the validity of the refund claim and ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to present their defense.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:23:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 164 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51926</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Order-in-Appeal that rejected the refund claim. It was held that filing a refund claim challenges the assessment order and is maintainable even without directly challenging the assessment through an appeal. The matter was remanded for further consideration, emphasizing the validity of the refund claim and ensuring the assessee&#039;s right to present their defense.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>