https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792309 A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not vitiated merely because the power of attorney holder did not specifically plead direct personal knowledge, where the complainant testified, was cross-examined, and no prejudice or failure of justice was shown; the conviction was therefore upheld. The custodial sentence was, however, reduced from six months' simple imprisonment to imprisonment till the rising of the Court, while the compensation and default clause were maintained. The revision succeeded only to that limited extent, leaving the conviction intact. en-us Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jun 2026 15:36:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792309 A complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was not vitiated merely because the power of attorney holder did not specifically plead direct personal knowledge, where the complainant testified, was cross-examined, and no prejudice or failure of justice was shown; the conviction was therefore upheld. The custodial sentence was, however, reduced from six months' simple imprisonment to imprisonment till the rising of the Court, while the compensation and default clause were maintained. The revision succeeded only to that limited extent, leaving the conviction intact. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792309