<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1524 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792322</link>
    <description>Limitation for an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code runs from the date of pronouncement of the impugned order, not from its upload or the appellant&#039;s later knowledge. The tribunal held that the statutory period under Section 61(2), including the outer limit of 30 days plus a further 15 days, is fixed and cannot be extended on equitable grounds. An alleged technical glitch in the e-filing portal did not justify condonation beyond that maximum period. The appeal was therefore treated as barred by limitation, and condonation was refused for want of jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 07:29:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1524 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792322</link>
      <description>Limitation for an appeal under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code runs from the date of pronouncement of the impugned order, not from its upload or the appellant&#039;s later knowledge. The tribunal held that the statutory period under Section 61(2), including the outer limit of 30 days plus a further 15 days, is fixed and cannot be extended on equitable grounds. An alleged technical glitch in the e-filing portal did not justify condonation beyond that maximum period. The appeal was therefore treated as barred by limitation, and condonation was refused for want of jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792322</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>