<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1533 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792331</link>
    <description>Classification of imported Zinc-EDTA was contested between Customs Tariff Item 3105 0000 and CTI 2922 4990, with the burden of proof on Revenue also raised as an issue. The Supreme Court noted that the order relied upon in the impugned order had not been challenged and had therefore attained finality. In that circumstance, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 07:29:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=904014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1533 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792331</link>
      <description>Classification of imported Zinc-EDTA was contested between Customs Tariff Item 3105 0000 and CTI 2922 4990, with the burden of proof on Revenue also raised as an issue. The Supreme Court noted that the order relied upon in the impugned order had not been challenged and had therefore attained finality. In that circumstance, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>