https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792370 Demand orders under Section 73 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017 and the resulting bank account attachment notices were set aside because the parties accepted that the dispute was governed by the Supreme Court ruling in Mineral Area Development Authority v. Steel Authority of India. The HC directed the competent authority to reconsider the matter afresh in light of that binding decision, with both parties free to place their respective stands before the authority. The recovery notices could not be sustained in their existing form pending such re-examination. en-us Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 May 2026 07:29:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792370 Demand orders under Section 73 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017 and the resulting bank account attachment notices were set aside because the parties accepted that the dispute was governed by the Supreme Court ruling in Mineral Area Development Authority v. Steel Authority of India. The HC directed the competent authority to reconsider the matter afresh in light of that binding decision, with both parties free to place their respective stands before the authority. The recovery notices could not be sustained in their existing form pending such re-examination. Case-Laws GST Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792370