https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792372 Defects in the arrest memo, including non-mention of the place of arrest, absence of the grounds of arrest as an annexure, and suspicious DIN particulars, were found to violate constitutional safeguards governing arrest and detention. The court held that the grounds supplied were not shown in the manner required for transparent administration and that the arrest process did not comply with binding judicial standards. On that basis, the arrest, detention and remand were held to be illegal and unconstitutional, and the remand order was quashed. en-us Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 27 May 2026 07:29:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792372 Defects in the arrest memo, including non-mention of the place of arrest, absence of the grounds of arrest as an annexure, and suspicious DIN particulars, were found to violate constitutional safeguards governing arrest and detention. The court held that the grounds supplied were not shown in the manner required for transparent administration and that the arrest process did not comply with binding judicial standards. On that basis, the arrest, detention and remand were held to be illegal and unconstitutional, and the remand order was quashed. Case-Laws GST Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792372