<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (7) TMI 107 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51919</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, rejecting the inclusion of notional testing charges in the assessable value of monoblock concrete railway sleepers supplied to the Ministry of Railways. It held that the demand was barred by limitation, as there was no suppression of facts justifying an extended period. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the demand of duty and personal penalty, ruling in favor of the appellants on both the merits and the limitation issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:09:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (7) TMI 107 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51919</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, rejecting the inclusion of notional testing charges in the assessable value of monoblock concrete railway sleepers supplied to the Ministry of Railways. It held that the demand was barred by limitation, as there was no suppression of facts justifying an extended period. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the demand of duty and personal penalty, ruling in favor of the appellants on both the merits and the limitation issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51919</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>