<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1579 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792377</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging an assessment order under section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act was not entertained because an effective statutory appellate remedy was available. The objection founded on section 6(2)(b) of the GST enactments was not examined at the writ stage. The Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction and left the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal within the prescribed time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 May 2026 07:29:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903968" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1579 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792377</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging an assessment order under section 74 of the Uttar Pradesh GST Act was not entertained because an effective statutory appellate remedy was available. The objection founded on section 6(2)(b) of the GST enactments was not examined at the writ stage. The Court declined to exercise writ jurisdiction and left the petitioner to pursue the statutory appeal within the prescribed time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>