<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (3) TMI 2108 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468945</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing comparability for an ITeS provider depends on functional similarity and reliable segmental data. Microland Ltd. and e4e Healthcare Business Services Pvt. Ltd. were retained because their software, infrastructure management, ITeS and healthcare outsourcing activities were treated as comparable. ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd. was excluded because its diversified software, consultancy, engineering, web development and BPO operations lacked reliable segmental results. Accentia Technologies Ltd. was excluded as a KPO and product-oriented provider of high-end healthcare services without usable segmental information. Acropetal Technologies Ltd. was excluded due to its diversified engineering, IT and healthcare BPO operations, including significant onsite activity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 16:46:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (3) TMI 2108 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468945</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing comparability for an ITeS provider depends on functional similarity and reliable segmental data. Microland Ltd. and e4e Healthcare Business Services Pvt. Ltd. were retained because their software, infrastructure management, ITeS and healthcare outsourcing activities were treated as comparable. ICRA Techno Analytics Ltd. was excluded because its diversified software, consultancy, engineering, web development and BPO operations lacked reliable segmental results. Accentia Technologies Ltd. was excluded as a KPO and product-oriented provider of high-end healthcare services without usable segmental information. Acropetal Technologies Ltd. was excluded due to its diversified engineering, IT and healthcare BPO operations, including significant onsite activity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468945</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>