https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792238 Revisional interference with a discharge order is confined to legality, propriety and correctness, and at the stage of charge the record must disclose only a prima facie case and grave suspicion, not proof after a roving inquiry. Here, the discharge was upheld because the complainant's version contained significant improvements and inconsistencies, the medical material did not clearly support the alleged injuries, no reliable corroboration was shown before the Magistrate, and the CCTV footage was not properly proved under the rules for electronic evidence. The Court found no perversity in the Sessions Court's view that the material was insufficient to proceed against the accused officers, and did not separately decide the sanction issue once the merits failed. en-us Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 26 May 2026 08:24:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792238 Revisional interference with a discharge order is confined to legality, propriety and correctness, and at the stage of charge the record must disclose only a prima facie case and grave suspicion, not proof after a roving inquiry. Here, the discharge was upheld because the complainant's version contained significant improvements and inconsistencies, the medical material did not clearly support the alleged injuries, no reliable corroboration was shown before the Magistrate, and the CCTV footage was not properly proved under the rules for electronic evidence. The Court found no perversity in the Sessions Court's view that the material was insufficient to proceed against the accused officers, and did not separately decide the sanction issue once the merits failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792238