<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1462 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792260</link>
    <description>Cash deposits in a bank account standing in the name of a trust&#039;s unit were not assessable as unexplained income in the individual assessee&#039;s hands under section 68, because the account was held and operated for the trust, and the assessee showed he was only an authorised signatory. Affidavit evidence, the trust&#039;s statement of affairs, bank records, and the trust&#039;s assessment order supported the explanation that the funds belonged to the trust. As no material established that the deposits were the assessee&#039;s undisclosed income or that he had beneficial ownership, and the same deposits had already been taxed in the trust&#039;s hands, the addition was deleted on the principle of taxing the right person in the right hands.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 08:24:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903824" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1462 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792260</link>
      <description>Cash deposits in a bank account standing in the name of a trust&#039;s unit were not assessable as unexplained income in the individual assessee&#039;s hands under section 68, because the account was held and operated for the trust, and the assessee showed he was only an authorised signatory. Affidavit evidence, the trust&#039;s statement of affairs, bank records, and the trust&#039;s assessment order supported the explanation that the funds belonged to the trust. As no material established that the deposits were the assessee&#039;s undisclosed income or that he had beneficial ownership, and the same deposits had already been taxed in the trust&#039;s hands, the addition was deleted on the principle of taxing the right person in the right hands.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792260</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>