<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1485 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792283</link>
    <description>Section 56(2)(viib) applies only where a company receives consideration for issue of shares in excess of fair market value. On the facts stated, the assessee had purchased or subscribed to shares and had not received consideration for issue of shares, so the provision did not apply and the quantum addition failed. Because the penalty was dependent on the deleted addition, it could not survive independently and was also deleted as consequential.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 08:24:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903801" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1485 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792283</link>
      <description>Section 56(2)(viib) applies only where a company receives consideration for issue of shares in excess of fair market value. On the facts stated, the assessee had purchased or subscribed to shares and had not received consideration for issue of shares, so the provision did not apply and the quantum addition failed. Because the penalty was dependent on the deleted addition, it could not survive independently and was also deleted as consequential.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792283</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>