<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (4) TMI 156 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51902</link>
    <description>Reliance on statements of co-noticees without securing effective cross-examination and without giving the assessee a meaningful chance to rebut the material was inconsistent with natural justice. The adverse findings based on such untested statements could not be sustained on the existing record, so the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after granting a reasonable opportunity to produce rebuttal evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:38:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90380" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (4) TMI 156 - CEGAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51902</link>
      <description>Reliance on statements of co-noticees without securing effective cross-examination and without giving the assessee a meaningful chance to rebut the material was inconsistent with natural justice. The adverse findings based on such untested statements could not be sustained on the existing record, so the matter was remanded for fresh adjudication after granting a reasonable opportunity to produce rebuttal evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51902</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>