<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1496 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792294</link>
    <description>Assessment orders issued under the GST Act on the basis that returns had not been filed could not survive once the taxpayer later filed the relevant GSTR-3B returns and paid the tax, interest, penalty and late fee. The High Court applied Section 62(2) and held that the deeming provision became operative on compliance, with the result that the earlier assessment orders stood withdrawn.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 08:24:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903790" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1496 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792294</link>
      <description>Assessment orders issued under the GST Act on the basis that returns had not been filed could not survive once the taxpayer later filed the relevant GSTR-3B returns and paid the tax, interest, penalty and late fee. The High Court applied Section 62(2) and held that the deeming provision became operative on compliance, with the result that the earlier assessment orders stood withdrawn.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>