https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51901 A broad company logo used across stationery, records and multiple products is treated as a house mark, not a product-specific brand name, so it does not by itself make a medicament a patent or proprietary product under Heading 3003 read with Chapter 30 Note 2. The classification claim was therefore rejected. Amprolium premix intended to be mixed into animal feed for prevention of coccidiosis in poultry is characterised by its composition, presentation and use as a feed preparation, not as a medicament. It was accordingly classifiable under Heading 23.02 as an animal feed pre-mix, and the consequential penalties and impugned classification could not be sustained. en-us Thu, 03 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:36:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51901 A broad company logo used across stationery, records and multiple products is treated as a house mark, not a product-specific brand name, so it does not by itself make a medicament a patent or proprietary product under Heading 3003 read with Chapter 30 Note 2. The classification claim was therefore rejected. Amprolium premix intended to be mixed into animal feed for prevention of coccidiosis in poultry is characterised by its composition, presentation and use as a feed preparation, not as a medicament. It was accordingly classifiable under Heading 23.02 as an animal feed pre-mix, and the consequential penalties and impugned classification could not be sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 03 Jul 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51901