<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1497 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792295</link>
    <description>Judicial review of arrest under a special fiscal statute is confined to compliance with statutory and constitutional safeguards, including proper authorisation, recorded reasons to believe, and communication of the grounds of arrest. On the material before it, the Court found that the arrest paperwork, translated grounds, and service of reasons reflected compliance, and the challenge based on alleged lack of family intimation or invalid service was not established. The Magistrate&#039;s remand order was also treated as reasoned because it recorded production of the accused, noted no complaint of ill-treatment, and showed application of mind to the relevant BNSS requirements. No violation of Articles 21 and 22 was made out.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 08:24:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1497 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792295</link>
      <description>Judicial review of arrest under a special fiscal statute is confined to compliance with statutory and constitutional safeguards, including proper authorisation, recorded reasons to believe, and communication of the grounds of arrest. On the material before it, the Court found that the arrest paperwork, translated grounds, and service of reasons reflected compliance, and the challenge based on alleged lack of family intimation or invalid service was not established. The Magistrate&#039;s remand order was also treated as reasoned because it recorded production of the accused, noted no complaint of ill-treatment, and showed application of mind to the relevant BNSS requirements. No violation of Articles 21 and 22 was made out.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792295</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>