<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (6) TMI 49 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51899</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the acceptance of reduced prices for ships imported for breaking up, based on discrepancies between contracted and actual goods. The Tribunal emphasized accurate valuation under Rule 4 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, rejecting the customs department&#039;s appeal to consider original prices, and underscoring the importance of transaction value reflecting the actual imported goods.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jul 2024 13:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90377" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (6) TMI 49 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51899</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai upheld the acceptance of reduced prices for ships imported for breaking up, based on discrepancies between contracted and actual goods. The Tribunal emphasized accurate valuation under Rule 4 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, rejecting the customs department&#039;s appeal to consider original prices, and underscoring the importance of transaction value reflecting the actual imported goods.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51899</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>