<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1843 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468900</link>
    <description>Order I Rule 10(2) confers a broad power to add, strike out or transpose parties whenever necessary for complete and effective adjudication, and Order XXIII Rule 1A operates as a special provision for withdrawal or abandonment cases without derogating from that wider power. Order XXIII Rule 1A is not the exclusive source of transposition; the court may still transpose a defendant as plaintiff under Order I Rule 10(2) where justice and complete adjudication require it. Opposition to transposition is not confined to the plaintiff, and any affected defendant may be heard. The appeal succeeded and the appellant was directed to be transposed as plaintiff for adjudication of the partition dispute on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 20:05:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1843 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468900</link>
      <description>Order I Rule 10(2) confers a broad power to add, strike out or transpose parties whenever necessary for complete and effective adjudication, and Order XXIII Rule 1A operates as a special provision for withdrawal or abandonment cases without derogating from that wider power. Order XXIII Rule 1A is not the exclusive source of transposition; the court may still transpose a defendant as plaintiff under Order I Rule 10(2) where justice and complete adjudication require it. Opposition to transposition is not confined to the plaintiff, and any affected defendant may be heard. The appeal succeeded and the appellant was directed to be transposed as plaintiff for adjudication of the partition dispute on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468900</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>