<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1936 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468908</link>
    <description>Persistent Systems Ltd. was found functionally dissimilar for transfer pricing benchmarking under the transactional net margin method because it was engaged in software products, software services and technology innovation, with material emphasis on product development and no reliable segmental bifurcation of product and service revenues. Broader functional similarity was treated as insufficient where material differences in business model remained. The earlier exclusion of the same company in the assessee&#039;s own case, as upheld by the jurisdictional High Court, supported exclusion, and the recalled earlier order had no continuing effect for this comparable. Persistent Systems Ltd. was therefore directed to be excluded from the final list of comparables.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 20:05:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903726" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1936 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468908</link>
      <description>Persistent Systems Ltd. was found functionally dissimilar for transfer pricing benchmarking under the transactional net margin method because it was engaged in software products, software services and technology innovation, with material emphasis on product development and no reliable segmental bifurcation of product and service revenues. Broader functional similarity was treated as insufficient where material differences in business model remained. The earlier exclusion of the same company in the assessee&#039;s own case, as upheld by the jurisdictional High Court, supported exclusion, and the recalled earlier order had no continuing effect for this comparable. Persistent Systems Ltd. was therefore directed to be excluded from the final list of comparables.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468908</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>