<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1942 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468914</link>
    <description>Cash deposits made during the demonetisation period were explained as arising from rental receipts and repayment of a loan. The record contained no material to discredit that explanation, and the lower authorities accepted it only partly without rebutting it with contrary evidence. On that basis, the balance addition treating the remaining deposits as unexplained was not justified and was directed to be deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 20:05:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903720" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1942 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468914</link>
      <description>Cash deposits made during the demonetisation period were explained as arising from rental receipts and repayment of a loan. The record contained no material to discredit that explanation, and the lower authorities accepted it only partly without rebutting it with contrary evidence. On that basis, the balance addition treating the remaining deposits as unexplained was not justified and was directed to be deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468914</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>