<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (1) TMI 180 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51893</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT ruled in favor of the soap manufacturer appellants in a dispute over the valuation of &#039;Breeze&#039; brand soaps manufactured for Hindustan Lever Limited. The Tribunal held that the price of bindis supplied with the soaps should not be included in the assessable value of the soaps due to the lack of connection between the bindis and the soap&#039;s price as per the contract. The appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:56:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90371" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (1) TMI 180 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51893</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CEGAT ruled in favor of the soap manufacturer appellants in a dispute over the valuation of &#039;Breeze&#039; brand soaps manufactured for Hindustan Lever Limited. The Tribunal held that the price of bindis supplied with the soaps should not be included in the assessable value of the soaps due to the lack of connection between the bindis and the soap&#039;s price as per the contract. The appeal was allowed, providing relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>