<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (7) TMI 2020 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468929</link>
    <description>Delayed filing of Form 10B was treated as a procedural issue, and exemption under section 11 was not to be finally denied at the processing stage where the audit report was already on record and a condonation application was pending before the competent authority. The governing framework placed condonation jurisdiction under section 119(2)(b) with the designated Principal Commissioner or Chief Commissioner, so the appellate authority should await that decision before sustaining an adjustment under section 143(1). The matter was therefore restored for fresh adjudication after disposal of the condonation request, reflecting that a procedural lapse should not defeat exemption where statutory conditions may otherwise be satisfied.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 20:05:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (7) TMI 2020 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468929</link>
      <description>Delayed filing of Form 10B was treated as a procedural issue, and exemption under section 11 was not to be finally denied at the processing stage where the audit report was already on record and a condonation application was pending before the competent authority. The governing framework placed condonation jurisdiction under section 119(2)(b) with the designated Principal Commissioner or Chief Commissioner, so the appellate authority should await that decision before sustaining an adjustment under section 143(1). The matter was therefore restored for fresh adjudication after disposal of the condonation request, reflecting that a procedural lapse should not defeat exemption where statutory conditions may otherwise be satisfied.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>