<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (8) TMI 1814 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468934</link>
    <description>Form 10B filed before the return was submitted and before processing could be treated as valid compliance for exemption under section 11, because the audit report requirement is procedural rather than substantive. Delayed filing of the report, by itself, was not enough to deny exemption where the report was otherwise on record and available for consideration. The stated approach favours substantial compliance and requires the exemption claim to be examined on merits instead of being rejected solely on a technical filing default.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 20:05:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903700" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (8) TMI 1814 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468934</link>
      <description>Form 10B filed before the return was submitted and before processing could be treated as valid compliance for exemption under section 11, because the audit report requirement is procedural rather than substantive. Delayed filing of the report, by itself, was not enough to deny exemption where the report was otherwise on record and available for consideration. The stated approach favours substantial compliance and requires the exemption claim to be examined on merits instead of being rejected solely on a technical filing default.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468934</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>