https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468936 Allegations of organised GST fraud, use of bogus firms, clandestine removal of goods, tax evasion and attempted destruction of evidence justified refusal of bail. The court treated the matter as a serious economic offence affecting public revenue, noted prima facie material of interference with evidence, and gave weight to the fact that investigation was ongoing, several co-accused were still absconding, and the alleged mastermind remained at large. On those facts, the applicant was found not fit for enlargement on bail and the bail application was declined. en-us Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 May 2026 20:05:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468936 Allegations of organised GST fraud, use of bogus firms, clandestine removal of goods, tax evasion and attempted destruction of evidence justified refusal of bail. The court treated the matter as a serious economic offence affecting public revenue, noted prima facie material of interference with evidence, and gave weight to the fact that investigation was ongoing, several co-accused were still absconding, and the alleged mastermind remained at large. On those facts, the applicant was found not fit for enlargement on bail and the bail application was declined. Case-Laws GST Fri, 28 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468936