<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (9) TMI 1770 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468886</link>
    <description>Article 215 treats a High Court as a court of record with inherent power to correct its own records, and that jurisdiction can support review of an order passed under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 even though the Act contains no express review provision. The existence of a complete arbitration code does not by itself exclude that plenary power. The requirements of Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 govern whether review relief should ultimately be granted, but they do not determine the threshold maintainability of the application. The review application was therefore maintainable and could proceed to merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 12:55:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903659" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (9) TMI 1770 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468886</link>
      <description>Article 215 treats a High Court as a court of record with inherent power to correct its own records, and that jurisdiction can support review of an order passed under section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 even though the Act contains no express review provision. The existence of a complete arbitration code does not by itself exclude that plenary power. The requirements of Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 govern whether review relief should ultimately be granted, but they do not determine the threshold maintainability of the application. The review application was therefore maintainable and could proceed to merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=468886</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>