<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (2) TMI 107 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51885</link>
    <description>The appeal against the Order-in-Appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) was dismissed by the Tribunal. The goods manufactured by the appellants for Steel Authority of India were included in the clearance value for exemption as they did not bear any brand name.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:39:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90363" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (2) TMI 107 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51885</link>
      <description>The appeal against the Order-in-Appeal by the Commissioner (Appeals) was dismissed by the Tribunal. The goods manufactured by the appellants for Steel Authority of India were included in the clearance value for exemption as they did not bear any brand name.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51885</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>