<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1382 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792180</link>
    <description>Delay in filing an appeal against approval of a resolution plan was condoned where the appellant relied on the later upload date of the impugned order and the Tribunal accepted the explanation in line with Supreme Court guidance. The Tribunal noted that a litigant is generally expected to apply for a certified copy under the NCLT Rules, 2016, but an exemption from immediate filing of the certified copy may be allowed. On the facts, and considering that delay had been condoned in a connected appeal against the same order, the appellant was permitted to proceed with liberty to place the certified copy on record within two weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 08:14:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903625" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1382 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792180</link>
      <description>Delay in filing an appeal against approval of a resolution plan was condoned where the appellant relied on the later upload date of the impugned order and the Tribunal accepted the explanation in line with Supreme Court guidance. The Tribunal noted that a litigant is generally expected to apply for a certified copy under the NCLT Rules, 2016, but an exemption from immediate filing of the certified copy may be allowed. On the facts, and considering that delay had been condoned in a connected appeal against the same order, the appellant was permitted to proceed with liberty to place the certified copy on record within two weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>