https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792182 Ex parte ad interim injunctions are appealable where they have operative effect, and a director's status under the Companies Act depends on appointment to the Board, not shareholding. Section 430 bars civil court interference with statutory processes under Section 169, even where a collateral contractual dispute is asserted, because the special Act's remedial framework remains available. Absence of locus standi before the NCLT does not by itself revive civil jurisdiction. Ex parte interim relief must rest on recorded satisfaction of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury; a boilerplate order without such findings is unsustainable. en-us Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 25 May 2026 08:14:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792182 Ex parte ad interim injunctions are appealable where they have operative effect, and a director's status under the Companies Act depends on appointment to the Board, not shareholding. Section 430 bars civil court interference with statutory processes under Section 169, even where a collateral contractual dispute is asserted, because the special Act's remedial framework remains available. Absence of locus standi before the NCLT does not by itself revive civil jurisdiction. Ex parte interim relief must rest on recorded satisfaction of prima facie case, balance of convenience, and irreparable injury; a boilerplate order without such findings is unsustainable. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 22 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792182