<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1412 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792210</link>
    <description>Interest earned by a co-operative housing society from deposits or investments with co-operative banks was treated as deductible under section 80P(2)(d), because the term &quot;co-operative society&quot; in section 2(19) is of wide import and a co-operative bank is not excluded from that character merely by section 80P(4). That provision only limits the bank&#039;s own eligibility for deduction and does not prevent a co-operative society from claiming deduction on interest derived from such investments. The contrary reliance on provisions dealing with surplus-fund income under section 80P(2)(a)(i) was held inapposite, and prior acceptance of the same claim in the assessee&#039;s own case supported the position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 08:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1412 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792210</link>
      <description>Interest earned by a co-operative housing society from deposits or investments with co-operative banks was treated as deductible under section 80P(2)(d), because the term &quot;co-operative society&quot; in section 2(19) is of wide import and a co-operative bank is not excluded from that character merely by section 80P(4). That provision only limits the bank&#039;s own eligibility for deduction and does not prevent a co-operative society from claiming deduction on interest derived from such investments. The contrary reliance on provisions dealing with surplus-fund income under section 80P(2)(a)(i) was held inapposite, and prior acceptance of the same claim in the assessee&#039;s own case supported the position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>