<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1413 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792211</link>
    <description>Business income was estimated by reference to past audited results rather than a flat 8% of receipts, because the assessee&#039;s turnover, contractual business pattern, and earlier net profit history were consistent. With prior years showing net profit rates of about 5% to 5.5%, the earlier trend was treated as the fair benchmark for estimation. The net profit rate was therefore directed at 5.75% instead of 8%, reducing the estimated income and granting relief to the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 08:14:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903594" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1413 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792211</link>
      <description>Business income was estimated by reference to past audited results rather than a flat 8% of receipts, because the assessee&#039;s turnover, contractual business pattern, and earlier net profit history were consistent. With prior years showing net profit rates of about 5% to 5.5%, the earlier trend was treated as the fair benchmark for estimation. The net profit rate was therefore directed at 5.75% instead of 8%, reducing the estimated income and granting relief to the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>