<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (3) TMI 174 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51879</link>
    <description>Immediate suspension of a Customs House Agent licence under Regulation 21(2) is valid only in an appropriate case where an enquiry is pending or contemplated against the concerned agent. Suspension of the Chennai licence was not justified because it rested only on the Tuticorin branch suspension, with no allegation or enquiry against the Chennai office, so it was set aside. By contrast, suspension of the Tuticorin branch licence was treated as permissible because the record showed allegations of filing a Bill of Entry without the importer&#039;s authorisation and possible violation of licensing conditions; however, continuation of that suspension had to follow a post-decisional hearing and a speaking order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:22:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=90357" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (3) TMI 174 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51879</link>
      <description>Immediate suspension of a Customs House Agent licence under Regulation 21(2) is valid only in an appropriate case where an enquiry is pending or contemplated against the concerned agent. Suspension of the Chennai licence was not justified because it rested only on the Tuticorin branch suspension, with no allegation or enquiry against the Chennai office, so it was set aside. By contrast, suspension of the Tuticorin branch licence was treated as permissible because the record showed allegations of filing a Bill of Entry without the importer&#039;s authorisation and possible violation of licensing conditions; however, continuation of that suspension had to follow a post-decisional hearing and a speaking order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=51879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>